Self-storage code amendments

Speaking for developer Scott Cooper, questioned why self-storage is a conditional use when more intense uses are permitted, urged a look at the residential-adjoining ban's effect on existing projects, and asked that pending plans be grandfathered.

Questioned the impetus for the changes and whether the same rules will apply across all commission districts, citing sprawl along Rockville Pike and Route 40; noted he is exploring joining the commission.

The Carroll Highlands resident of 36 years asked the commission to distinguish large storage from small, protect residential neighbors with bigger setbacks and no vehicle storage, and apply any new rules to non-vested projects.

An attorney for Barefoot Land Company, whose Route 32 C-3 facility is planned, asked for a definition of loading areas, flexibility on windows and signage limits, and clarity on whether design rules apply to all building sides.

Speaking for contract purchaser Scott Cooper (file S-24-0018 on Liberty Road), she asked the commission to grandfather plans already in process, reconsider making storage conditional in C-2, and keep design review discretionary.